It was a fine Friday evening… until our own Shadzter found this on the web.
Say what you will about how you feel towards Sonic Adventure 2, whether you find it to be the best or worst game ever, but I think we can all find some common ground when it comes to the questionable quality of this… “review”?
I don’t know, am I actually allowed to call it that?
Sonic Adventure 2, PSN/XBLA/ £6.49/800MS Points
THEY say never go back for a reason.
This was a great game more than ten years ago – a release to celebrate the tenth anniversary of the Sonic franchise in 2001.
It was the final Sonic title to come out on Sega hardware and was the best game on the Dreamcast.
You get what you expect with Sonic. Speed, rings and corny voices.
Not something to rush out and get, unless you’re feeling particularly nostalgic, or you harbour a determination to play all of the Sonic games.
Little to no pertinent information concerning the topic, barely any details, no insight into the subject matter, not getting their facts straight… Wow, thought I was reading something from Fox News for a sec!
Where’s the professionalism? Why did the reviewer not talk about the actual game? No effort’s been applied into this “unreview” (that’s much better). And funny, I don’t recall Ice Cap being in Adventure 2… or Tails being outside of his mech for that matter! Either the reviewer didn’t know which game he was playing or that’s some falsifying right there.
Never thought I’d be the one nitpicking anything! I mean really, how is this even a review? Where was this published? I mean, it’s not like it’s been written for a paper that’s sold in droves nationwide, thus giving its country-sized base of readers a false impression on it or anything, right? Imagine if it would also be, for example, the UK’s most popular newspaper and it was constantly riddled with tabloid and gossip! That be bad news right there if it were real, right guys? HAHA!